05 October 2018

Letting go – 5 October 2018


Letting go is a major theme of contemplative life and prayer.  It is as though we have two ways we can live – one is clinging, and the other is relinquishing.  Jesus seemed to be in no doubt… freedom and truth, joy and peace, if they are there, are down the path of relinquishing.

Let’s look at clinging.  Of course we know what it means -- it means to hang on to something, to grip, stick or adhere.  A character in a novel I read referred to his ever-looming mother-in-law as Old Clingwrap.  In Old English, interestingly, cling could mean also to wither or shrivel… which is a bit of a warning.  We can easily cling to possessions, as we know.  That can be good, or not.  These things we own may be beautiful, or valuable, or carry memories – important then for such reasons.  We all have property, and we do what we can to keep it nice.  We protect it.  We give thanks for it.  It is important to have a view of how we would be if we had to relinquish it – as, at present, in Sulawesi or Syria.  Jesus visited these themes, and there are echoes in the Sermon on the Mount and in the parables.   

But possessions are only the start.  There is clinging to or letting go of aspects of the past.  Of course, we can’t “un-remember” things.  Neither, in a way, should we.  It matters, often, that we don’t forget, that we re-member, in the sense that we reassemble the past in our minds and memories, accurately and with understanding, even when it is painful.  The relinquishing of memories, then, is not pretending anything was otherwise than it was, but doing the work to ensure that events of the past are accurate and understood, and that they are not poisoning the present any more.  The stillness and silence of contemplative prayer is a gracious pathway down which the stings of the past may indeed be gently drawn, and we realise one day that we have moved on.

Or it may be that the challenge is to let go of people.  Sons or daughters grow up, we hope, have their own lives, aspects of which we don’t share… we lose loved ones, who aren’t there any more… old friends unaccountably change…  I am well aware that this is a minefield of many emotions.  But love is scarcely love if it clings, or tries to control or possess.  Love entails the willingness to let go, to accord freedom to the loved one.  It is the way we are loved, by God, who as we know creates and gifts us with freedom and choice.  Our love of God too is very much a matter of letting-go.  We do not own or control faith or truth.  We humbly receive these things, learning as we go, and confirming it day by day, that all is gift and grace. 

If you think about it, letting-go may come with a sense of release.  If I can, as I can, I relinquish control and the need to control.  Faith says it is for the sake of something better, which I may not yet fully see or understand.  Ageing, often problematic, may indeed be seen in another light. Other people can do the tasks I used to do.  I may have to take leave of religious assumptions that sustained me once upon a time, but not now.  I now require space, for mindfulness, for thought, for managing physical issues, for remembering and reassessing and enjoying, for being still and silent, and perhaps alone.  And there will come a time, a kairos, when I must let go even of all that.  And in Lady Julian’s words, all will be well.

28 September 2018

Because the bell rings – 28 September 2018


One of the best-known quotes from the Benedictine writer Sister Joan Chittister originated when she was addressing her fellow nuns in a seminar, and she asked them, “Why do we pray?”  They supplied all sorts of worthy and lofty answers.  But Sr Joan said, “No – we pray because the bell rings.”   And indeed the Rule of St Benedict provides[1]: On hearing the signal… monastics will immediately set aside what they have in hand and go with utmost speed, yet with gravity…  But then comes a typical Benedictine touch – the first Psalm, Benedict orders, is to be said quite deliberately and slowly, to give time for latecomers.

Now what is the point here?  Sr Joan provides it, in a way, in one sentence:  Prayer is not just one more thing in the day….  She adds: We are meant to go to it consciously, seriously, with concentration, so that every day we may become more and more immersed in the presence of God.  Well, to modern devotees of the secular culture, this sounds simply incomprehensible...  more and more immersed in the presence of God.  It is what they always feared about religion and religious people, that you retreat into some dreamland based on hopes and myths, and lose your grip on truth and reality.  But also, to many sincere church-going people, it sounds over the top.  Prayer, they would say, is a Good Thing, no doubt, in its place… and so on.  It suits some church folk very well (not all of course) to have their prayer said for them in an orderly and objective manner, by priest or vicar or pastor, in familiar language, at set times.

A contemplative person is one who, we might say, after weeks or months of perhaps shaky attention to a discipline of silence and stillness, woke up one morning and realised that familiar attitudes and actions were shifting, altering.  Making a space in which we are simply present, having a mantra as something to return to repeatedly from the drip-feed of distractions and preoccupations… all of this is effecting change.  The changes are subtle, but at times unmistakable.  There are various ways in which prayer-silence, attention, insight, we might say, are now quietly and gently spilling over into all of life.  The heart and the mind inwardly know… oddly enough, often enough, by unknowing.  We may be aware of a new steadiness.  Fears, anxieties, seem no longer to loom the same ways.  We are disinclined to talk about it much – or at any rate, if we do, we might later wish we hadn’t. 

It is what the 17th century French Carmelite monk, Brother Lawrence, called The Practice of the Presence of God.[2]  It is absolutely not that we have become starry-eyed and always on the edge of some rapture... “heavenly-minded but no earthly use”, as some have put it.  Just the opposite – we are now freer than we were to attend to truth and to reality, and to bear pain. 

In the monastery the bell rings at set times.  In lay contemplative life it rings frequently, usually faintly in the background, as a reminder and a call.  We are those for whom the bell tolls… we hear, and we respond with love.



[1] Rule of St Benedict, ch 43
[2] My copy is a translation by New Zealander, E M Blaiklock (Hodder & Stoughton 1981.  Published also by Thomas Nelson, 1982). 

21 September 2018

The Parable of the Child – 21 September 2018


Then he took a little child and put (the child) among them; and taking (the child) in his arms, he said to them, “Whoever welcomes one such child in my name welcomes me, and whoever welcomes me welcomes not me but the one who sent me.” (Mark 9:36-37)

There are levels of meaning here.  The disciples had been having a private chat about precedence… who is great in the coming kingdom, and who will be not so great.  Jesus inconveniently intervenes… what were they arguing about?  He reminds them, whoever wants to be first must be servant of all… which sits uneasily with our culture of being a winner, getting ahead…

I think however it is what we might call the “Parable of the Child” that brings this event to life.  All three gospel writers report, a little child,[1] a toddler, an infant.  The point of the diminutive noun is that this child is helpless without us, is entirely dependent on adult care for growth and health, maybe even for survival.   Jesus took the child in his arms, it says.  It is the child who is first, has precedence, in Jesus’s kingdom.  There it is for all to see.  There is no higher priority in the kingdom.  Jesus could scarcely say it more clearly – but he nails it with his words: Whoever welcomes one such child in my name welcomes me, and whoever welcomes me welcomes not me but the one who sent me.  God is watching that child, and what we do… or neglect.  On one level it is about our duty of care for our children, of course – but it is also about what matters most in Jesus’s kingdom, which is decidedly not power, wealth or achievement. 

Al Jazeera ran a reportage on what is in fact happening to children, at present, in various places as a result of war, violence, ignorance and neglect.  We saw children in their thousands, many of them skeletal, already too ill to respond to medical help and recover – in Yemen, in Syria, in the Congo, in South Sudan…  I think there is a special place in hell for people who make war on children.   

Then there is the searing truth of generations of gross abuse of children within the church and elsewhere.  And after we have expended a million words on cause and blame and retribution, the fact is, the only satisfactory response is for the violence and the abuse to utterly cease, and for children to be cared for as our first duty, as Jesus clearly taught.

…then, in my anger, perhaps providentially, Fr Laurence Freeman intervened in a general post.  He reminded us: The contemplative response to violence should affirm the goodness and potential of humanity.  Further along he wrote: Meditation doesn’t solve problems. It transforms how we see and approach them – including the most ancient and intractable problem of humanity, the inhumanity of violence.  We are to do what we can, of course, which is to renounce violence, so far as it lies with us, at any rate absolutely against children – and again absolutely, as we can, teach and initiate and practise love and recognition of children, and care, shelter, food and education, security, hope and faith, for the children we know.  If we neglect that, I suspect, any of our other achievements might strike the heavenly courts as unimpressive.



[1] Greek paidion, παιδιον, diminutive of pais, παις, a child.

14 September 2018

Response – 14 September 2018


…on the way he asked his disciples, “Who do people say that I am?”  And they answered him, “John the Baptist; and others, Elijah; and still others, one of the prophets.”  He asked them, “But who do you say that I am?” (Mark 8:27-29)

On the way… is a popular motif in the gospels.  They typically talked as they walked, on the road.  It’s a picture to trigger our imaginations – they learned as they went along, as we do, day by day, if learning and growing are what we want.  Not everyone welcomes learning new things or changing.  If what we hope for is things to stay the same, with certainty, safety and security, then learning and growing are scarcely going to happen.  But in Jesus’s company, evidently, the changing scenery facilitated developing hearts and minds. 

He asked them first, what are people saying about me… who do they say I am?  The answers show how we feel better if we can categorise, simply pin a label, good or bad, on someone[1] – that way, we have pigeon-holed things in an orderly manner, we know what we think, and best of all, we may have established that we are not threatened, life can continue…  So, reply the disciples, some say you are John the Baptist back to life again, some say Elijah, others say some other of the prophets.   It is a warning about labelling Jesus – if I want to know who Jesus is, really, it’s pretty pointless to ask around, conduct a poll, do a street survey, even around the church. 

So Jesus asks: But you… who do you say I am?  Peter knows the answer.  You are the Christ, ὁ Χριστος, the Anointed One – Messiah, in Hebrew.  It is a catechism answer, and the implication is that, since it is the “right” answer, it is the answer for everyone.  In some Christian circles defining Jesus correctly (or Mary, or the Trinity…) is used as a test of orthodoxy… as every parish minister discovers before long. 

But Jesus asks a crucial question.  Who do you say I am…?  It is an invitation to discover, in our own personal experience, over the years and through the mysteries and setbacks and sadnesses, as well as the triumphs of life, who he is.  What matters is not the catechism answer, but my answer.  Moreover, my answer today might differ significantly from my answer 30 years ago, or even last year – because I am further along the road, learning as I go.  The issue is not whether I am “correct” in my answer, but whether my answer is what I am living by, enlightened by, whether my answer is coming from doing justly, loving mercy, walking humbly.  What matters is not the labels I put on Jesus, even labels prescribed by church or bible, although they may be helpful… so much as what he is making of me as I take step after step, as I remember the great gospel themes and teachings, as I review what has happened in my life and among the people I know and love, and as I value the times I am able to spend in silence and stillness, simply present to God as God in Christ is, and always was, present to me.

(In our group's discussion later, one member said Jesus might have been clearer if he had asked, "But who am I to you...?"  I agree.)



[1] Eg. I was labelled, on Facebook this week, “a racist low-life”.  The person feels better now, having categorised me.

07 September 2018

Joy without a cause – 7 September 2018


"But you and all the kind of Christ
Are ignorant and brave,
And you have wars you hardly win
And souls you hardly save.

"I tell you naught for your comfort,
Yea, naught for your desire,
Save that the sky grows darker yet
And the sea rises higher.

"Night shall be thrice night over you,
And heaven an iron cope.
Do you have joy without a cause,
Yea, faith without a hope?"

It’s G K Chesterton, Ballad of the White Horse, written over 100 years ago, 1911, as he watched events building up to the First World War catastrophe – and, as a convinced practising believing Christian, he watched the posturings of a compromised church blessing battleships.  Then it was for him, as it is now for many of us, increasingly and urgently a matter of how to express the way of Christ in a world rife with menace and mendacity – the sky grows darker yet, the sea rises higher -- when the church too seems to have lost its way… but to remember also the joy that remains at the heart of it all, in Christ – joy without a cause, faith without a hope, writes Chesterton…  It is reminiscent of another of Britain’s 20th century poets, T S Eliot:

I said to my soul, be still, and wait without hope

For hope would be hope for the wrong thing; wait without love

For love would be love of the wrong thing; there is yet faith

But the faith and the love and the hope are all in the waiting.

Wait without thought, for you are not ready for thought:

So the darkness shall be the light, and the stillness the dancing.[1]

It is the poets who come to our help, the psalmists, the Hebrew verse we usually ignore in the Book of Job, Ecclesiastes, Lamentations, not afraid of mystery and unanswered questions, speaking to our hearts, often in imponderables, paradoxes, expressing our conflicts.  Did you notice in Eliot…waiting without words… the faith the hope and the love are all in the waiting, he says… wait without thought… the darkness shall be the light and the stillness the dancing.  He describes exactly what we do in Christian Meditation.

I profoundly believe, our basic duties in discipleship -- doing justice, loving mercy, walking humbly -- will need to be sustained in the church and the world of the days ahead by simple disciplines of silence, stillness and consent to God.  It is what the poets call waiting.  Down that road lies what St Paul named joy, the fruit of the Spirit that comes next after love.[2]



[1] T S Eliot: East Coker, in Four Quartets.
[2] Galatians 5:22

31 August 2018

Merton’s epiphany – 31 August 2018


Here are words you may have heard before, from Thomas Merton’s “Conjectures of a Guilty Bystander”, written back in the mid-1960s:  In Louisville, at the corner of Fourth and Walnut, in the centre of the shopping district, I was suddenly overwhelmed with the realization that I loved all those people… that we could not be alien to one another even though we were total strangers.  It was like waking from a dream of separateness, of spurious self-isolation in a special world, the world of renunciation and supposed holiness… This sense of liberation from an illusory difference was such a relief and such a joy to me that I almost laughed out loud…

He was a Cistercian monk, master of novices at the Gethsemani monastery in Kentucky.  He had gone in to Louisville on some errand for the monastery.  To this day,[1] at the corner of Fourth and Walnut, a notice commemorates “Merton’s Epiphany”, which changed him deeply and permanently.  So what had happened?  I would like to express this as clearly as I can, because we need to understand the changes that begin to occur in contemplative life and prayer.

Merton had set himself, over more than 20 years by now in the monastery, to be a good monk.  It was difficult for him, partly because of his independent, questioning nature, partly because he and his abbot were at odds.  The Rule of St Benedict is actually a liberal and flexible way of life and faith, but Merton had set out to do it perfectly, and to teach it to his novices…  Now, somehow, spontaneously, in downtown Louisville, he was turned from being occupied with his personal faith and obedience – and thus inevitably, what he saw as his frequent failures and fallings-short – to seeing that the miracle of the kingdom is there anyway.  Merton didn’t have to achieve it, he had to join it.  It wasn’t about Thomas Merton – it was about being surrounded and enveloped anyway by grace, which on the corner of 4th and Walnut he could see already embraced all the world including him.  To become a giver he had first to be a receiver.  It is not about measuring up, it is about saying Yes, in all our inadequacy.  It is not first our love for God, but God’s love for us, and for all.

I am putting these things in my way, 60 years later and outside any monastery.  Merton experienced a kairos, a moment of grace and truth.  These are moments when there is no bargaining and no regret, writes Fr Laurence Freeman.  We are not doing deals with God.  We are empty-handed and consenting at the deepest levels of our consciousness.  We enter the kingdom in the only way, by a humble Yes.  And in this we are deeply at one with all the world and all its pain and injustice.

Merton points out that it is inseparable with joy.  He experienced relief and freedom.  It informed and inspired the rest of his life and teachings.  We are here to do justice, love mercy, walk humbly.  There are failures and sadnesses ahead.  But we are moving from the charmed circle of me and my needs and my fears and my ego – and all my doings and possessions and anxieties.  Priority has shifted… and it is such a liberation.



[1] You can see it, if you look carefully, on Google Earth.

24 August 2018

Powers of darkness – 24 August 2018


For our struggle is not against blood and flesh, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers of this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.  (Ephesians 6:12)

Paul was a man of his time, he was educated in both Greek and Roman thought as well as his native Hebrew culture – and all of these, like all ancient cultures, in various ways assumed an invisible realm of spirits, both good and bad but certainly perilous.  Powers,[1] Paul called them, invisible but potent.  Spiritual forces of evil, is another phrase he uses.  Earlier in Ephesians he actually tells them that before they came to Christ they followed the course of this world… the ruler of the power of the air… the spirit at work among those who are disobedient…[2]  But most importantly, he saw Christ as having defeated the cosmic powers[3].  Jesus by his resurrection became what Christian theology eventually called Christus Victor, Christ the Conqueror.  Jesus’s death and resurrection initiated a battle in which the outcome in time and beyond time is certain.

Now, somehow this sweeping cosmic view has to be rendered in terms meaningful to 21st century intelligence and spiritual experience.  I suppose there are plenty of people who still assume that we are surrounded and threatened by evil spirits – in I Peter we read about your adversary the devil prowling around, looking for someone to devour…[4]  Well, some might think that good for putting the frighteners up recalcitrant children…

…until we take serious notice of what is going on in our world, in which...  Truth, if inconvenient, becomes arbitrarily labelled as fake, untruth…  Mindless violence is increasingly seen as the way to resolve differences…  People make war on children…  Cruelty is used as though its victims are of no account.  Religion is warped and distorted into credulity, superstition and fear…  The natural environment is plundered...  Power is routinely possessed and misused, rather than being held in trust for good.  There is a force of evil which takes possession of people and of communities, usually masquerading as righteousness, but sometimes quite undisguised. 

And I believe it remains true that Jesus confronts and defeats this power, even if it is just that he shows us another way, and holds our hearts true to doing justice, loving mercy, and walking humbly with God.[5] But he also empowers and inspires us by the Spirit he promised.  The prayer of silence and stillness is our reminder, daily, of truth and wisdom and the way of Christ in our desperately wounded world.



[1] Greek archē (ἀρχη)
[2] Ephesians 2:2
[3] See eg. Romans 8:38; I Corinthians 15:24-28; Colossians 1:13; 2:15… etc.
[4] I Peter 5:8
[5] Micah 6:8